Minnesota sure knows how to pick political turds. Some of the most inept, corrupt and just plain terrible politicians in the country seem to find their way up the toilet wall and out of the bowl to serve in Minnesota. Just think about it...Tim Walz, Ilhan Omar, Mark Dayton, Al Franken, Jesse Ventura and Keith Ellison. You may not know Keith Ellison if you're not from the Midwest. Keith Ellison doesn't deserve to be serving the people of Minnesota, but like all the other political turds I mentioned earlier, the people of Minnesota deserve Keith Ellison because they keep voting for him. It does make one wonder why, with other choices at their disposal, would voters champion someone so devoid of character and utterly riddled with personal issues? Minnesota is hopelessly Democrat to the core. It suffers from hundreds of thousands of white voters who vote the way their parents always did forty years ago, for the DFL, and they can't see past the failures of the left to change their ways. The large urban areas are the only places left that vote consistently Democrat and they carry the state in each and every election. The pointy-headed white, educated, psuedo-intellectuals in Minneapolis, St Paul, Duluth and Rochester are really the ones that make Minnesota the perennial embarrassing political joke that it maintains itself as. Remember 1984? This is the Keith Ellison base; guilt-ridden white voters and minorities that have bought into the long, failed lies of the left. It's just proof positive that no matter how scandal plagued you are, if you have a D behind your name, you'll win. Decades of failure also makes for a weak Republican bench.
Ellison was accused of abusing his ex-girlfriend by her and her son prior to Ellison running for Attorney General in 2017. There was a lot of evidence, including abusive text messages, doctor's notes on abuse, a video of Ellison dragging her off a bed and many community members who heard the girlfriend's story prior to it ever coming out in the press. Her son was also a witness to the abuse and shared what he knew online and to media, yet the fools in Minnesota didn't care. They also didn't care that Ellison was a devout follower of Louis Farrakhan and had publicly made many antisemitic statements. Ellison was also affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR, the Council for American-Islamic Relations , which is a Hamas front-group. In 2008, Ellison expressed support for Sami Al-Arian, the North American head of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. These associations should've been an automatic disqualifier for public office, but like so many things that would damage any Democrat, the liberal press barely mentioned them and Democrats wouldn't have cared if they did. Ellison won easily. He started out in the state legislature and then moved to the 5th congressional district and won in 2006 to go to Washington. In 2016, after winning his congressional seat once again and feeling very comfortable he had escaped his radical fundamentalist past, Ellison threw his hat in the ring to run the DNC nationally. In a rare show of moderate thinking, many Democrats nationally found Ellison's past to be so troublesome that they rallied around making sure he didn't win the job. It may have been the last time the Democrats raised their voices against antisemitism because in the 2024 pre-election Democrat Party, being anti-Jew was all the rage. Ellison fit right in. However, in 2017 his bid to run the DNC failed, but to not offend any aggrieved group, he was made deputy-chair. The next cycle, he decided to run for State AG. Again, escaping his radical past he ran and won the election to be the Attorney General for Minnesota. A truly embarrassing pick to adjudicate the morals of a state - someone who abused a woman and funded radical terrorist groups. Does anyone really believe that someone who ran around with Muslim extremists, spoke in their favor, attended their rallies and help fund their movements, would just drop it all when he got elected to public office? No, he worked with these people behind the scenes, often going counter to official government policy. Money from these extremists poured into his campaign to get him elected with expected returns later. Do we not vet these people with background checks before they work in government? Nope. He would never pass a basic background check, yet had no problem roaming the halls of Congress. How dangerous is that? These relationships with known terrorist, extremists and antisemites are not made up. All of these things have been verified, so we're not talking about speculative things. No one with those ties should ever be in a position of power in this country.
So, why all these years later, am I attacking Keith Ellison? Well, turds stink and the stench coming from the AG office is that of a wokeism that just won't die. Despite being trounced in the 2024 elections, die hard radicals like Ellison never put the mantle down. Democrats have always hated the Constitution and Ellison is no exception. We have heard since 2019 how much the Democrats hate the First Amendment. The buzz word, misinformation, has been used so much that it has kind of lost all its meaning. Anyone on social media during the pandemic saw firsthand how Democrats abused the misinformation mantra by suppressing, canceling and separating anyone not following the science of the pandemic. A science that was utterly and totally false. Ironically, it was the misinformation police that allowed the misinformation to rule social media. The cover up of Hunter Biden's laptop, the lies about Ivermectin, the fraud of the so-called vaccine, the corruption of the media and NIH, it was all a lie. Yet, Democrats were willing to take away people's jobs and retirement savings and destroy people publicly all for things that were false. It was absolute proof of the left's love affair with totalitarianism. Once Elon Musk bought Twitter, boy did the corruption come to light. Social media was taking their direction to censor citizens from the FBI, who was told to do so by the Biden Administration. It was as if we were in Russia or China. Our government, totally corrupt, pushing false and political narratives which actually harmed the lives of Americans. This lie of misinformation was still alive throughout the 2024 campaign with the left complaining about there being no checks and balances on Donald Trump and his supporters for all the misinformation they were spreading. Two problems with that line of thinking. One, it is totally unconstitutional to restrict speech you don't like as you have the right to say pretty much anything you want and two, who the hell were they to think they should be the arbiter of what the truth actually was? They had already abused that privilege through totalitarian means with the backing of a corrupt police force, the FBI. It is under this banana republic like mindset, where you ignore or tear up the Constitution to suit your needs that we find ourselves in this story. Keith Ellison is currently in court trying to defend a newly enacted law in Minnesota against "deep fakes" used during an election. This not so veiled attempt to once again control speech, to make the left the arbiter of the truth, is being challenged in court and in a bit of irony, I believe this law will only hurt the Democrats in the future, but nevertheless, something quite funny has happened. Something totally embarrassing to Keith Ellison and what most of us would call karma. I will let our friends at Powerlineblog.com tell the story as I discovered it there and got quite a bit of joy from it. So much that I had to share. The uses of misinformation | Power Line
In fairness to the actual source, which Poweline cites, “Misinformation expert cites non-existent sources in Minnesota deep fake case” by Christopher Ingraham in the Minnesota Reformer;
A leading misinformation expert is being accused of citing non-existent sources to defend Minnesota’s new law banning election misinformation.
Professor Jeff Hancock, founding director of the Stanford Social Media Lab, is “well-known for his research on how people use deception with technology,” according to his Stanford biography.
At the behest of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, Hancock recently submitted an affidavit supporting new legislation that bans the use of so-called “deep fake” technology to influence an election. The law is being challenged in federal court by a conservative YouTuber and Republican state Rep. Mary Franson of Alexandria for violating First Amendment free speech protections.
Hancock’s expert declaration in support of the deep fake law cites numerous academic works. But several of those sources do not appear to exist, and the lawyers challenging the law say they appear to have been made up by artificial intelligence software like ChatGPT.
For instance, the declaration cites a study titled “The Influence of Deepfake Videos on Political Attitudes and Behavior,” and says that it was published in the Journal of Information Technology & Politics in 2023. But no study by that name appears in that journal; academic databases don’t have any record of it existing; and the specific journal pages referenced contain two entirely different articles.
“The citation bears the hallmarks of being an artificial intelligence (AI) ‘hallucination,’ suggesting that at least the citation was generated by a large language model like ChatGPT,” attorneys for the plaintiffs write. “Plaintiffs do not know how this hallucination wound up in Hancock’s declaration, but it calls the entire document into question.”
Separately, libertarian law professor Eugene Volokh found that another citation in Hancock’s declaration, to a study allegedly titled “Deepfakes and the Illusion of Authenticity: Cognitive Processes Behind Misinformation Acceptance,” does not appear to exist.
If the citations were generated by artificial intelligence software, it’s possible that other parts of Hancock’s 12-page declaration were as well. It’s unclear whether the non-existent citations were inserted by Hancock, an assistant, or some other party. Neither Hancock nor the Stanford Social Media Lab replied to repeated requests for comment. Nor did Ellison’s office.
Frank Bednarz, an attorney for the plaintiffs in the case, said that proponents of the deep fake law are arguing that, “unlike other speech online, AI-generated content supposedly cannot be countered by fact-checks and education.”
However, he added, “by calling out the AI-generated fabrication to the court, we demonstrate that the best remedy for false speech remains true speech — not censorship.”
While trying to steal the free speech of Minnesotans, the floating turd has brought in an expert to support his abomination of a law and instead has proven exactly why this particular law is unconstitutional. A misinformation "expert" uses misinformation to misinform Minnesotans. The expert should be ridden out of academia on a rail for breaking all ethical standards and morals. Ellison should be flung out of office on a supersonic rocket for bringing in this charlatan. Fake, AI-generated sources, citing fake stories, now written into the judicial record is so perfect that I couldn't have written a better tale if I had tried. Did they think no one would look into the sources? Were they really that stupid? Or is it just corruption? Of course, the purpose of this "deep fake" law is to suppress speech that Democrats don't like. Marxists like Ellison believe controlling speech and information is how you get people to conform. Uninformed and misinformed voters tend to vote for Democrats, of course, and if you never believed in the Constitution, you need to force people to see it your way. This massive blunder, however, should show exactly why free speech is so vital to our liberty and should put this law into question. Any judge worth their salt, would strike it down. In a side note, this also supports my thoughts on AI being a very dangerous thing for our society. AI is now actively deceiving people, to what end...we don't know. However, whether the AI was told to lie or not isn't the question. Why is it allowed to lie is the question. I digress.
The hypocrisy of the left will never cease to amaze me. However, because it is Minnesota, no one will notice, and Ellison will not suffer for his attempted corruption. He's skated his whole life, bamboozling apathetic Democrat voters who just see a Muslim man rather than the antisemitic, terrorist supporting, woman abuser that he is. If this had happened to a Republican, he'd be done politically in a place like Minnesota, but in Minnesota, this is just Tuesday if you're a Democrat.
UPDATE:
Since I wrote this article last fall, there have been several updates on the Keith Ellison front. Elon Musk has now sued Ellison and the State of Minnesota for the deep fake law in the above article. The law was clearly written to attack the Trump Administration with a clear long term goal of criminally charging any conservative they feel might be a political threat in the state. It bars anyone found guilty under the law from running for office in the State. So far, the only ones in the nation to be caught using deep fakes have been Democrats, so you think this law would come back to haunt them later, but if you have the judiciary in your back pocket then, maybe not. Ellison has already sued the Trump Administration 15 times since January. All frivolous and all politically motivated. However, some of this litigation also appears to be cover for Ellison as he has been implicated in bribery charges linked to the worst case of fraud in Minnesota history. With Ellison on tape during the bribery, he will most likely be forced from office and possibly criminally charged. The evidence is so clear that if he isn't in prison soon, it will be the worst miscarriage of justice in Minnesota since the George Floyd cover up.
Known as the Feeding Our Future scandal in Minnesota, where a growing list of around 70 individuals scammed the federal and state government out of $250 million by falsifying the number of meals they were serving under-privileged children during the pandemic, in some cases, never serving any and falsifying thousands of claims. It has been the biggest black eye for the Walz Administration and Ellison in state history. At least forty-five people have plead or been found guilty of fraud so far, right under the nose of Walz and Ellison. Now, we find Ellison met with all the guilty parties back in 2021 and discussed strategy with them. The attendees literally spell out how they are defrauding the federal and state government in the audio. Ellison states that he is on their side and that racism is rampant in the agencies of the state and he has been interceding to stop it. The attendees repeatedly talk about supporting Ellison financially and he then offered help with their legal battle against the Minnesota Department of Education, his own client. Money then was sent nine days later by the attendees to Ellison and his son Jeremiah, running for Minneapolis City Council, to the tune of $20,000 in campaign contributions. Talk about criminal. The State AG taking bribes to help with defendants legal battles against his own client, the state. Any moral person, especially the AG of a state, would never take a meeting with people who were suing his client. Then, one month after he receives the money, in January of 2022, the Feds raid multiple locations of Feeding our Future. Ellison then puts out a laughable public statement that he's been fighting to hold Feeding our Future accountable for a long time. Once the raids became public, Ellison distanced himself from the attendees of the meeting, many of whom he already knew. The reporting of the trials in early 2025 was all over the local media. During the trial of one individual, a juror had $120,000 in cash dropped off at her home for a not guilty verdict. She was dismissed and the party involved was arrested, so these trials have been a circus. The meeting and talk of donations is on a 55 minute audio recording of Ellison and the attendees, some now in jail, that was released by the Center of American Experiment last week. The recording was made by one of the attendees and was entered into evidence, in one of the trials, but never used. American Experiment asked the lawyer of the defendant if he could have the recording and was granted it. Here's the link to the story;
https://www.americanexperiment.org/whos-who-on-the-keith-ellison-fof-tape/
Because this is absolutely damning for Ellison, I expect the media to not report on it at all. I haven't seen one word in the national press, but you can hear the recording for yourself on American Experiment's own website. It appears to be just Tuesday in Minnesota again, but guilt is guilt and Ellison should not be allowed to escape this one as he has dodged all the other scandals he's been involved in. It appears Keith Ellison is at the center of the scandal and I do expect an indictment. Some clips of him being questioned by a house committee have come to light and Ellison lied repeatedly. Luckily, his feet were held to the fire and his statements are all refuted by the audio recording. Even though he never directly asks for money, he tells them he's on their side and repeats twice that money is freedom. The attendees understand what he's indirectly saying and offer money to the candidates that support them. Ellison never dissuades them. He then takes their money. We'll see who turns on him and maybe we can wake up and it'll be Wednesday in Minnesota.
Add comment
Comments